The Day After Tomorrow
A Movie Eye Member Movie Review!

Author: David Litton
Notify me by email when this member writes a new movie review! Privacy Policy
Your Email Address:
Posted to Movie Eye: 6/8/2004
Film Release Date: 5/28/2004
Rated: PG-13 (intense situations of peril)
Length: 124 minutes
Produced by: Roland Emmerich, Mark Gordon
Directed by: Roland Emmerich
Cast: Dennis Quaid, Jake Gyllenhaal, Emmy Rossum, Dash Mihok, Jay O. SAnders, Sela Ward, Ian Holm
[Contact these cast members for free autographs.] [Celebrity Birthdays]
Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox Pictures

Hollywood 411 On Set: This Is It
 
Beyonce sizzles red hot
 
Dustin Hoffman stands outside of Da Silvano Restaurant for what seems like the longest phone call ever - could bad reception be
 
Mortensen and Theron in new film
 
Kate Gosselin Apologizes
 
More Celebrity Videos >>
  Like this review? Type your email address into the box above to be notified whenever this critic posts a new review to Movie Eye!

Critic's Grade: B-



The films of Roland Emmerich are like the popcorn you'd by at the concession stand before entering the auditorium for the main feature: the more butter and cheese, the better the taste. Which makes "The Day After Tomorrow" an appetizing snack that leaves you wanting more when all the top layers of flavor have given way to the crumbs that lay at the bottom of the bag. This is a little surprising, considering just how gung-ho Emmerich is about big-budget, effects-loaded blockbusters that focus more on the best CGI available than anything else. I guess what I'm trying to get across here is this: why pay for a lecture on global warming, when what you're really there for is the visual simulation of its aftermath?

Not that there aren't moments in "Tomorrow" that aren't worth catching on the big screen, especially after being teased with a smart marketing campaign for so long. Anyone with half a brain knows that you don't go to a movie like this looking for deep characters or thought-provoking plot. It's all about the special effects, and let me tell you, these are some of the most awe-inspiring effects I've seen in a movie of this sort. Move over, "Armageddon" and "Deep Impact"; step aside, "The Core." In terms of its visual interpretation of natural disasters gone loco, this is the queen mother of all epic Earth-in-peril movies.

The plot is pretty basic, with a bunch of people running around making discoveries about sudden, erratic changes in the globe's weather patterns, beginning with the separation of a large chunk of Antarctic ice, and leading up to the disruption of the North Atlantic Current, which supplies the Northern Hemisphere the heat it needs from the Equator to keep the weather from getting out of hand. Once that happens, everything just goes crazy. Typhoon-spawned twisters start popping out of the sky over Los Angeles, while basketball-sized hail falls in Tokyo and snow drops in New Delhi. And let's not forget poor New York City, which finds itself awash in heavy rain, followed by the rising waters of the Atlantic, which quickly consume the city's lower half before freezing under the temperatures of a new ice age.

All of this is captured with glorious and stunning realism by the filmmakers, and it's apparent that a lot of work and effort went into making sure that such scenes were believable in terms of appearance. Watching that wave of water overtake the Statue of Liberty as it heads straight for the Big Apple is nothing short of jaw-dropping, to say nothing of the Russian tanker that makes its way past the public library while the waters remain unfrozen. After the screening, I found myself wondering if I could be considered a sadist for wanting more of the destructive eye candy and less of the mopey human subplots, most of which were completely tossable from the get-go.

The human aspect of the film centers around Jack Hall (Dennis Quaid), a government climatologist whose theories about global warming's effects suddenly starting making some waves- both figurative and literal- in Washington and elsewhere. He keeps in contact with Professor Terry Rapson (Ian Holm), who clues him in to the fact that what was once believed to take place hundreds of years in the future could very well be happening right now. It just so happens that Jack's son, Sam (Jake Gyllenhaal) is in New York for a decathlon to impress a girl on his school's team; later, once the city that never sleeps is devastated by nature's wrath, Jack sets out on a course from D.C. to save his son before it's too late.

Now, I'm not exactly sure what his chances of survival would be in real life, especially considering that the temperature drops at times to below one-hundred degrees Fahrenheit, causing everything- buildings, humans, you name it- to freeze instantaneously. Nor am I convinced that our government is as ignorant of nature's potential for danger as the film makes its political figures out to be. It all has to do with Emmerich's attempts to give us a stern talking-to about where our planet is headed if we continue on the course we're on, and if you ask me, it was completely uncalled for. Summer is supposed to be about escapism, about forgetting our schooling and lessons for a few fleeting months and venturing to the theater to see a movie that destroys the world many times over. "The Day After Tomorrow" does just that, but wants to put us back in the classroom while doing so.

Copyright @ Hauntnut.com

All Reviews by David Litton [Home page]
If you are the author of this review, you may edit it by signing in.

 

Write to all of your favorite stars and receive free autographed photos!

Post Comments About This Film or Review



Comments by Aviance    12/11/2004
I though this was a good movie. The plot was good because this can really happen to us. No matter how much you think that nothing like that can really happen to us. One, anything is possible and two, the earth is connected in different ways and if you mess something up that is very important in our world things can happen.

Comments by Aviance    12/11/2004
I though this was a good movie. The plot was good because this can really happen to us. No matter how much you think that nothing like that can really happen to us. One, anything is possible and two, the earth is connected in different ways and if you mess something up that is very important in our world things can happen.

Comments by LA'ASIA MONIQUE MARIE MEANS    12/4/2004
I COULD WRITE BETTER STUFF THEN THAT JUST WATCH BUT IT WAS GOOD

Comments by not telling    9/2/2004
I disagree, that movie was horrible. Yeah right, new york is flooding from an iceberg, right, whats next, worlds biggest waterfall discovered in death valley due to equater rupture. Look you can sell this crap to the press but not to an intelligent audience. And the actors sucked, really. The kid in the movie should drop the broad, loose the black fraud, and look in the mirror and say, iam no f***ing spiderman- toby maguire wannabe.

Comments by Daniel James Brown    8/1/2004
I thought this film was well acted by the celebs and the effects were out of this world,enough to make you think what if this really does happen.

Comments by C. Dave    7/12/2004
Well said David! I agree with you completely. This film isn't about deep characters or plots. But the special effects and (to me) unrealistic nature of the film (I didn't go to see real life on film) it well worth my after matinee movie ticket.


 

Add your comments about this film or review:

Post a review of your own...

 



   Celebrity Addresses
  
Celeb Address Search:

Search!
Sign In | Sign Out
Celebrity Birthdays!
MyStars
Members Helping Members
Recent Successes
Celebrity Forums
Join



Movie Eye
 Movie Reviews Hotspot Community Celebrity Addresses
  We Put The Stars In Your Eye! ™